Cases 51 - 60 of 64
GRANT v. THE BANK OF YORK et al
as 1:2012cv00529
Plaintiff:
DEMITRUS L. GRANT
Defendant:
GREGORY A. STOUT and THE BANK OF YORK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00044
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Dyson v. Kay et al
as 1:2011cv00378
Plaintiff:
Zar D Dyson
Defendant:
Jay Kay, Warren Dailey, Joshua Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kemp v. Grant County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2011cv00156
Plaintiff:
Ashlee A Kemp
Defendant:
Grant County Sheriff's Department and Corporal Shugart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00015
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Westbrook v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2010cv00526
Plaintiff:
Rickie Westbrook, Sr
Defendant:
Indiana State of , Grant County Prosecutor's Office , Lisa Glancey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trevino v. Tittle et al
as 1:2009cv00248
Plaintiff:
Joel Angel Trevino
Defendant:
Drew Tittle, Josh Zigler, Richard Eastes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
COATS v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2009cv00595
Plaintiff:
JAROD COATS
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, COMMISSIONER, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and GRANT COUNTY SHERIFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
