Cases 51 - 60 of 176
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00830
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Human Rights Defense Center v. Greene County Ohio et al
as 3:2017cv00381
Plaintiff:
Human Rights Defense Center
Defendant:
Greene County Ohio , Kirk Keller, Jail Administrator , Gene Fischer, Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Britt v. Hamilton County, Ohio et al
as 1:2017cv00724
Plaintiff:
Lisa Britt
Defendant:
Hamilton County, NaphCare, Inc., Jim Neil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hadnot v. PTS of America, LLC. et al
as 1:2017cv00655
Plaintiff:
Serica Hadnot
Defendant:
PTS of America, LLC, Gerald Muldoon, Jeff Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Key Bank et al
as 1:2017cv01115
Plaintiff:
Karla Jenkins
Defendant:
Key Bank, James Bitterman, Sylvia Queppet and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
White v. City of Warren et al
as 4:2017cv01109
Plaintiff:
Jimmie White
Defendant:
City of Warren, Chris Martin, Jason McCollum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Klein v. Hamilton County et al
as 1:2017cv00219
Plaintiff:
John Klein
Defendant:
Hamilton County, NaphCare, Inc, Jim Neil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Montgomery County et al
as 3:2016cv00517
Plaintiff:
James J Howard
Defendant:
Montgomery County, Naphcare, Ms. Theresa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Burgess v. Southeastern Ohio Regional Jail et al
as 2:2016cv00903
Defendant:
Southeastern Ohio Regional Jail, State of Ohio, Warden Jeremy Tolson and others
Plaintiff:
Burgess and Lorenzo Dean'Dre Burgess
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Filing Error
as 3:2016cv02226
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Phillips
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, Management and Training Corporation, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
