Cases 51 - 60 of 848
Rutka v. Meriden et al
as 3:2022cv01394
Plaintiff:
John Rutka
Defendant:
City of Meriden, Don Angersola and Building Dept of City of Meriden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Pileggi et al v. Mathias et al
as 3:2022cv01315
Plaintiff:
Katharine Pileggi and Anthony Pileggi
Defendant:
Kim Mathias, Joette Katz, Kaela Minerly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2022cv01314
Plaintiff:
Gordon Clark
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Ned Lamont, William Tong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grant et al v. Lamont et al
as 3:2022cv01223
Plaintiff:
Eddie Grant, Jr., Jennifer Hamilton, Michael Stiefel and others
Defendant:
Edward M. Lamont, Jr., James Rovella, Patrick Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gumaneh v. Stamford et al
as 3:2022cv01105
Plaintiff:
Muhamdou Gumaneh
Defendant:
City of Stamford, Willie Guilford, Thomas Landry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Sanes et al v. Vasquez et al
as 3:2022cv01023
Plaintiff:
Braulio Sanes and Jennifer Matos
Defendant:
Carlos Vasquez, John Does, City of Bridgeport and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Liu v. Minchella et al
as 3:2022cv00996
Defendant:
Raymond Lesko, Anthony R. Minchella, John E. Doran and others
Plaintiff:
Lance Liu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00931
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00897
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
