Cases 51 - 60 of 77
Sosa-Ortega v. Corkins et al
as 3:2010cv01162
Plaintiff:
Victor Sosa-Ortega
Defendant:
Samuel Corkins, John Doe, 1, John Doe, 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hansen v. City of Cookeville, Tennessee et al
as 2:2010cv00097
Plaintiff:
Ivor Hansen
Defendant:
City of Cookeville, Tennessee, Chase Mathis, Darrin Stout and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez-Calderon v. Jones et al
as 3:2010cv00814
Plaintiff:
Luis Gonzalez-Calderon
Defendant:
Truman Jones, Bob Asbury, Rutherford County Sherriff's Office-Rutherford County, Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramos-Macario v. Jones et al
as 3:2010cv00813
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ramos-Macario
Defendant:
Truman Jones, Bob Asbury, Rutherford County Sherif's Office ruthrford County, Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eady v. Young et al
as 4:2010cv00057
Plaintiff:
Ronald Eady
Defendant:
Drew Young, John Doe, 1, John Doe, 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Hale et al
as 3:2010cv00736
Plaintiff:
Joyce Brown
Defendant:
Michael Hale, John Doe #1 and John Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Bond et al
as 2:2010cv02544
Plaintiff:
Freddie Davis
Defendant:
Joe Bond, Christy Williams, Melvin Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Roane County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2010cv00297
Plaintiff:
Martha Davis
Defendant:
Roane County, Tennessee , Mike Farmer , Dustin Hensley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mata-Cuellar v. Tennessee Department of Safety et al
as 3:2010cv00619
Plaintiff:
Diana Mata-Cuellar
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Safety, David Mitchell, Michael Hogan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carpenter et al v. Doe 1 et al
as 2:2010cv02425
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Carpenter and Curtis A. Verrett
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, Memphis Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
