Cases 51 - 60 of 903
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03934
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Junious v. W. Baker et al
as 1:2022cv03681
Plaintiff:
Angelica Lavern Junious and Angelica Junious
Defendant:
SGT. W. BAKER #3159, R/O C. CHENGARY #16269, R/LT PURCELL #758 and others
Intervenor:
C. NORRIS LAW GROUP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nave v. Wells et al
as 1:2022cv03566
Plaintiff:
Dr. Ken S. Nave
Defendant:
Christy Wells, Peter Theiler, Cathy Barbour and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03335
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Payne v. Doe
as 1:2022cv03285
Plaintiff:
Michael Payne
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jefferson v. Chris Hillas et al
as 1:2022cv03268
Plaintiff:
Nokomis Jefferson
Defendant:
Officer Chris Hillas, Officer George Castro, Officer Marcia Fambro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bowes-Northern v. Pedcor Management Corp et al
as 1:2022cv03031
Plaintiff:
Shedrick Bowes-Northern
Defendant:
Pedcor Management Corp, Valparaiso Fire Department, Kurt Glomb and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Walker v. Pritzker et al
as 1:2022cv02857
Plaintiff:
Jabari-Abdu: Walker
Defendant:
J.B. Pritzker, City, The, Richard Irvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
A.G., et al v. Chicago Police Officer John Doe, al
as 1:2022cv02775
Plaintiff:
A.G. and Cierra Corbitt
Defendant:
Chicago Police Officer John Doe and City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jordan v. Gearhart et al
as 2:2022cv02110
Plaintiff:
Samara Jordan
Defendant:
Marci Gearhart, Jennings, Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
