Cases 51 - 60 of 92
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv05481
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. et al
as 2:2015cv03278
Plaintiff:
ALICE JOHNSON
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. , PHELAN, HALLINAN & DIAMOND, PC , PHELAN, HALLINAN & SCHMIEG, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBERTS v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE et al
as 3:2015cv02352
Plaintiff:
MAGGIE ROBERTS
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, JOSEPH FUENTES, ADAM TIGHE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00438
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00615
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
GILMORE v. BOROUGH OF LAWNSIDE et al
as 1:2012cv05917
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY D. GILMORE
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF LAWNSIDE, CARMEN COLON, MARY ANN WARDLOW and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv05212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
SNYDER v. HUNTERDON FAMILY PRACTICE OBSTETRICS et al
as 3:2012cv00151
Plaintiff:
GALEN EUGENE SNYDER
Defendant:
HUNTERDON FAMILY PRACTICE OBSTETRICS, LISA PLUNKETT, M. KENDRA LEWIS, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
