Cases 51 - 60 of 203
Miller v. Arrowood
as 2:2019cv00235
Plaintiff:
Murice Arvil Miller
Defendant:
Jason Arrowood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIDDENS v. LAWSON et al
as 7:2019cv00141
Defendant:
NATHANIEL HAUGABROOK, GEORGIA BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, WAYNE CARROLL and others
Plaintiff:
RICKY GIDDENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Roberson et al v. Gwinnett County, Georgia et al
as 1:2019cv03478
Defendant:
Albert J. Miller, Gwinnett County, Georgia and Ronnetta L. Coates
Plaintiff:
Kevin Roberson, Kahlil Abdullah and Khalil Abdullah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. LAND
as 4:2019cv00077
Defendant:
CLAY D LAND, BROOKS TRUCKING COMPANY INC OF MEMPHIS, Judge CHARLES R WILSON and others
Plaintiff:
EMMETT L WILLIAMS
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephens v. State of Vermont et al
as 1:2019cv01479
Defendant:
Deputy Kenyon, Town of Pittsfield, Vermont, Rutland County, Vermont and others
Plaintiff:
Kalyn Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams et al v. City of Cartersville et al
as 4:2019cv00045
Plaintiff:
Daidron Williams, Eutychus Wilson, Aaron Conelly and others
Defendant:
Cullen LaFrance, Joshua Coker, Mark Mayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00760
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00283
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00170
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
MILLER et al v. FOWLER et al
as 5:2018cv00442
Defendant:
GARY NOBLES, JR, TWIGGS COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS and CHAIRMAN KENNETH E FOWLER
Plaintiff:
RUTH FALLS MILLER and HOWARD J MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
