Cases 51 - 59 of 59
WOODARD v. MORRISON et al
as 1:2009cv00899
Plaintiff:
CAROL WOODARD
Defendant:
TIMOTHY MORRISON, WINFIELD ONG, MICHAEL WELCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS FOR REFORM NOW et al v. MURPHY et al
as 1:2009cv00849
Plaintiff:
ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS FOR REFORM NOW, ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS FOR REFORM NOW, INDIANA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE and others
Defendant:
ANNE W. MURPHY, CATHY BOGGS, J. BRADLEY KING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MURPHY et al v. INDIANA WOMEN'S PRISON et al
as 1:2009cv00759
Plaintiff:
SHELLEY MURPHY and DARA MARCUM
Defendant:
INDIANA WOMEN'S PRISON, INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTION and CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Murphy v. Family Christian Stores Inc et al
as 2:2009cv00146
Plaintiff:
Avlin Murphy
Defendant:
Family Christian Stores Inc, Julie McNutt, Denise Abram and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Bell v. Murphy et al
as 3:2009cv00148
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Bell and Tiffany Bell
Defendant:
Anne W Murphy and Zach Main
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00981
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
MURPHY v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 4:2007cv00046
Plaintiff:
DELBERT E. MURPHY
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
