Cases 51 - 60 of 200
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00067
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Cazares v. Pritzker et al
as 1:2019cv07856
Defendant:
La Shawnda Bishiop, Kwame Raoul, Chicago Public Schools and others
Plaintiff:
Avangelina V Cazares and Josue J Turcios
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robinson v. Cook County et al
as 1:2019cv06672
Defendant:
Kent D. Hook, COOK COUNTY, a municipal corporation,, Thomas J. Dart and others
Plaintiff:
Clinton Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sypolt et al v. The Illinois Gaming Board et al
as 1:2019cv05991
Defendant:
Mark Ostrowski, Anthony Garcia, Thomas Hobgood and others
Plaintiff:
Trudy's Cafe, LLC, Kevin Sypolt and Phase IV-D, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duebbert v. St. Clair County et al
as 3:2019cv00717
Defendant:
Office of State's Attorney Appellate Prosecutors of the State of Illinois, Lorinda Lamken-Finnell, City of Belleville, Illinois and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Ronald R Duebbert and Ronald R Duebbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mack v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2019cv04001
Defendant:
Sgt. Hoover, P.O. Robinson, K. Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Kiontae Mack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01710
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00395
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Alexander v. Robinson et al
as 2:2018cv02291
Defendant:
Krystian Ingram, Vermilion County Illinois, Richard Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Dejuan Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. The City of Elgin et al
as 1:2018cv05108
Defendant:
Brad Duffy, Adam Green, Heather Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Mace Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
