Cases 51 - 60 of 105
SMITH v. RASE'S SHOP 'N SAVE OWNERS
as 2:2016cv01366
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
RASE'S SHOP 'N SAVE OWNERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. MERCY BEHAIVOR HEALTH et al
as 2:2016cv01326
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
MERCY BEHAIVOR HEALTH, CHRIS CHRISTIFER and BRENDA HARRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. U.S.S. STEEL CORPRACTION OWNER"S
as 2:2016cv01323
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
U.S.S. STEEL CORPRACTION OWNER"S
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL
as 2:2016cv01324
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. DEFENTS AN OWNERS WALMART CORPRACTIO OF PENNSYLVNIA et al
as 2:2016cv01328
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
DEFENTS AN OWNERS WALMART CORPRACTIO OF PENNSYLVNIA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. BAN O RAIL ROADS CORPRACTIONS OWNERS et al
as 2:2016cv01327
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
BAN O RAIL ROADS CORPRACTIONS OWNERS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRACTION and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. CHIEF SEACAITORY OF THE ARMY
as 2:2016cv01325
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
CHIEF SEACAITORY OF THE ARMY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SMITH v. AFREZZA CORPRACTION MANKIND et al
as 2:2016cv01273
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
AFREZZA CORPRACTION MANKIND and TOUJO SANOFI CORPRACTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. VIVITROL CORPRACTION
as 2:2016cv01275
Plaintiff:
DEWIT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
VIVITROL CORPRACTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SMITH v. ERIE COUNTY JAIL YEAR 1987 WARDEN et al
as 2:2016cv01272
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH
Defendant:
ERIE COUNTY JAIL YEAR 1987 WARDEN and BUFFLO STATE HOSPITAL DIRECTOR YEAR 1987
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
