Cases 51 - 60 of 406
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Seay v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2022cv04922
Plaintiff:
Tamika Seay
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Andrea David Vega and Judge Robert V. Rodatus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Caudle v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv04865
Plaintiff:
Allen Okechukwu Caudle
Defendant:
United States of America, Fulton County, State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04665
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04426
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Manuel v. The United States et al
as 1:2022cv04152
Plaintiff:
David Rowland Manuel
Defendant:
The United States and All Magistrate Judges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Fitzpatrick v. United States et al
as 1:2022cv03727
Plaintiff:
Roquita-Michelle Fitzpatrick
Defendant:
United States and Henry County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Swanson v. Rettig
as 1:2022cv00119
Plaintiff:
Brian D. Swanson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service, Charles P. Rettig and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
