Cases 61 - 70 of 262
Mohammed v. The State of Illinois et al
as 3:2020cv50133
Defendant:
Andrea Szczepanski, Paul Leong, Saima Azfar and others
Plaintiff:
Abdul Mohammed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sinclair v. McLean County Board et al
as 1:2020cv01082
Defendant:
McLean County Board, Habitat for Humanity, Bank of America Capital Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Aries Sinclair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Thuet et al v. Chicago Public Schools et al
as 1:2020cv01369
Plaintiff:
Michelle Brumfield and John Thuet
Defendant:
Janice Jackson, Chicago Public Schools, Laura LeMone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grubbs v. McFarland et al
as 1:2020cv01075
Plaintiff:
Matthew Grubbs
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe 2, Amy L McFarland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson et al v. McLean County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2020cv01073
Defendant:
Brent Wick, Aaron King, Brandon Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne Patterson, II and Wayne Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Sexton et al
as 3:2020cv03039
Defendant:
Brent Keele, Todd Sexton, Beatrice Calhoun and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prince et al v. Bridge et al
as 1:2020cv00294
Defendant:
Manuel Figueroa, John Bridge, 911 Operators and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell Prince, Derrick Prince, Jacquelyn Advocates for Victims of Medical Murder Disguised as Natural Causes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Montague v. AJ et al
as 2:2019cv02342
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Montague
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Justin Lamont Anderson and AJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv07477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2019cv07375
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO CITY OF CHICAGO, William Whitley and City of Chicago
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
