Cases 61 - 70 of 78
Anderson v. Town of Leesburg et al
as 1:2010cv00295
Plaintiff:
Robert Anderson
Defendant:
Town of Leesburg, Joseph R. Price and David M. Payne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00198
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disability (Public Accomodations)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disability (Public Accomodations)
Newhard v. Borders et al
as 3:2009cv00020
Plaintiff:
Nathan Newhard
Defendant:
Matt Borders, Unnamed Town of Culpeper Police Officers 1-100, Scott H. Barlow and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Casella v. Borders et al
as 3:2009cv00019
Plaintiff:
Jessie M. Casella
Defendant:
Matt Borders, Unnamed Town of Culpeper Police Officers 1-100, Scott H. Barlow and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01335
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Davis v. Town of Cary North Carolina et al
as 4:2008cv00038
Plaintiff:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Town of Cary North Carolina, Harold Weinbrecht, State of North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Corbin v. Woolums et al
as 3:2008cv00173
Plaintiff:
Mary E. Corbin and Mary E. Corbin
Defendant:
Everette B. Woolums, The Town of Tappahannock, Virginia, The Tappahannock Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
