Cases 61 - 70 of 170
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv12642
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv12295
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv06420
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
VILA v. UNION CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2018cv10603
Defendant:
UNION CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT , CITY OF UNION CITY , TARANTINO and others
Plaintiff:
JORGE VILA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FULBROOK v. BEURKLIN et al
as 1:2018cv08810
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM FULBROOK
Defendant:
MATTHEW BEURKLIN , TOWNSHIP OF MONROE , JOHN MCKEOWN and others
Cross_claimant:
JOHN MCKEOWN , TOWNSHIP OF MONROE and MATTHEW BEURKLIN
Cross_defendant:
MATTHEW BEURKLIN , JOHN DOES 1-5, JOHN DOES 6-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
QUIGLEY v. BOROUGH OF LAVALLETTE et al
as 3:2018cv03246
Plaintiff:
KAREN QUIGLEY
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF LAVALLETTE, ARTHUR REECE, JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GAYDEN v. DIODATI et al
as 3:2018cv01101
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH A. GAYDEN
Defendant:
SERGEANT I DIODATI, NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, TROOPERS JOHN DOES (1 & 2) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00647
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Duvall v. Smith County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2018cv00039
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Hugh Duvall, Jr.
Defendant:
Smith County, Mississippi , Smith County, Mississippi, Sheriff's Department , Smith County, Mississippi, Board of Supervisors and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TAWIL v. JACKSON TOWNSHIP et al
as 3:2018cv00706
Plaintiff:
ISAAC TAWIL
Defendant:
JACKSON TOWNSHIP, JACKSON TOWNSHIP TOWN COUNSEL, ROBERT A NIXON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
