Cases 61 - 70 of 102
Guglielmo v. Montgomery County, Ohio and the Montgomery County Board of Commissioners et al
as 3:2017cv00006
Plaintiff:
Joseph Guglielmo
Defendant:
Montgomery County, Ohio and the Montgomery County Board of Commissioners, Phil Plummer, Matthew Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brandon v. City Of Zanesville et al
as 2:2016cv01044
Plaintiff:
Ronald Brandon
Defendant:
Steven Welker, Randy Wilson and County of Muskingum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ali El v. Brandon et al
as 1:2016cv02396
Plaintiff:
Abdul Hakim Ali El
Defendant:
Thomas E. Brandon, Agent Remick, Agent Harvey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edmonds v. City of Newark et al
as 2:2016cv00930
Plaintiff:
Brandon G. Edmonds
Defendant:
City of Newark, Doug Wells, A. Minton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edmonds v. Licking County et al
as 2:2016cv00921
Plaintiff:
Brandon G. Edmonds
Defendant:
Licking County, Tim Bubb, Ken Oswalt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv02459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Duncan v. Smith et al
as 5:2015cv02204
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Marie Duncan
Defendant:
Robert Smith, Mike Volpe, Mark Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01892
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Duncan v. Ohio Supreme Court-Court of Claims et al
as 5:2015cv01845
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Marie Duncan
Defendant:
Ohio Supreme Court-Court of Claims, Brandon Harris, Mike Volpe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Duncan v. Ohio Supreme Court-Court of Claims et al
as 1:2015cv00579
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Marie Duncan
Defendant:
Ohio Supreme Court-Court of Claims, Brandon Harris, Mike Volpe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
