Cases 61 - 70 of 93
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01831
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
ADAMS et al v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS
as 1:2012cv01806
Plaintiff:
KENDALE L. ADAMS, MARTA E. BELL, VINCENT C. BURKE and others
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Lichtsinn et al
as 1:2012cv00414
Plaintiff:
Ronnie W Moore
Defendant:
Nicholas Lichtsinn, David Wilkins, Lisa Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BELL et al v. WARD et al
as 3:2012cv00072
Plaintiff:
ALORDO BELL and MICHAEL FLEMMING
Defendant:
MARCUS CRAIG, EVANSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, BRYAN HIRSCHMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Smith v. Bell et al
as 3:2011cv00437
Plaintiff:
Edward Cook Smith
Defendant:
John Bell, Ms Davis, Ms Amy Ball and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES et al v. BALDWIN et al
as 3:2011cv00131
Defendant:
Mayor Al BALDWIN, CITY OF VINCENNES, CITY OF VINCENNES BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS AND SAFETY and others
Plaintiff:
TROY JONES and TROY JONES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00805
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Wilms v. Barton et al
as 1:2011cv00201
Plaintiff:
Cassondra Wilms
Defendant:
Officer Barton , Officer Bell , Officer Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
