Cases 61 - 70 of 102
JONES v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2013cv04298
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY JONES
Defendant:
NUTTER, DARRELL L. CLARKE, MARK SQUILLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sampson v. Simmers
as 4:2013cv00986
Plaintiff:
Earl Sampson
Defendant:
William (Bill) Simmers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KOENIG v. MILLVALE BOROUGH et al
as 2:2013cv00447
Plaintiff:
JOHN KOENIG
Defendant:
MILLVALE BOROUGH , JOHN KELLY , POLLY GRIMPE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv02876
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PONTON et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA-EXECUTIVE & ADMINISTRATIVE BRANCH/PHILADELPHIA COUNTY COURT CIVIL DIVISION/OFFICE OF SHERIFF et al
as 2:2012cv01083
Plaintiff:
DONNELL PONTON and KYLE PAYNE
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA-EXECUTIVE & ADMINISTRATIVE BRANCH/PHILADELPHIA COUNTY COURT CIVIL DIVISION/OFFICE OF SHERIFF, CHRISTOPHER A. DENARDO, SHAPIRO & DENARDO, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00755
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv06033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
BRETT v. IZZI et al
as 2:2011cv05969
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Defendant:
FRANK IZZI, FELICIA BRUNO and BILL SHULTZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv04544
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Knight v. Chief Lowmiller & the South Williamsport Police Department et al
as 4:2011cv00493
Plaintiff:
Lawrence H Knight, II
Defendant:
Lowmiller, Diane Kemp Hoover, Al Hoover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
