Cases 61 - 70 of 84
O'SHELL v. CLINE et al
as 1:2010cv01660
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. CLINE and DAN HACKLER
Plaintiff:
GLORIA K. O'SHELL
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Fingers v. Knaver
as 2:2010cv00381
Plaintiff:
Derek D Fingers
Defendant:
Dan Knaver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
STATE OF INDIANA et al v. FIELDS et al
as 1:2010cv01223
Counter Defendant:
MARSHAL RICK BUSH, CARTHAGE TOWN MARSHALL, COUNTY OF RUSH and others
Plaintiff:
CARTHAGE TOWN MARSHALL, COUNTY OF RUSH, RUSH COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. and others
Counter Claimant:
ROBERT F. FIELDS
Defendant:
ROBERT F. FIELDS and SHERIFF JOHN SHERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STARR v. BURTON et al
as 1:2010cv00689
Defendant:
CONGRESSMAN DAN BURTON and CONGRESSMAN JOE DONNELLY
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ALAN STARR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MILLER et al v. IGER et al
as 3:2010cv00051
Defendant:
DAVID AXELROD, EVAN BAYH, GLENN BECK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
REED et al v. TOWN OF FISHERS et al
as 1:2009cv01247
Plaintiff:
SANDRA REED, KENNETH REED and MICHAEL DOWNEY
Defendant:
TOWN OF FISHERS, DAN CLAASEN, THE CITY OF NOBLESVILLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Browning v. South Bend City of et al
as 2:2009cv00203
Plaintiff:
Tavares J Browning
Defendant:
South Bend City of, Sgt James M Wolff, Sgt Mark J Szweda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Young et al
as 2:2009cv00192
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Ronell Jackson
Defendant:
Dan Young and Schafbuch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
