Cases 61 - 70 of 140
Pirela et al v. Calderon et al
as 1:2016cv09672
Plaintiff:
Joseph Pirela and Jose J. Pirela
Defendant:
Ethiel Calderon, David Countin, Mercedes Aleman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pirela v. Miranda et al
as 1:2016cv09673
Plaintiff:
Joseph Pirela
Defendant:
Angel Miranda, Denis Fonseca, Thomas Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
INVESTMENT BUILDERS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. et al v. Cichon et al
as 3:2016cv00497
Defendant:
AFFORDABLE HOUSING ACQUISITIONS, INC, AHV ARROWHEAD PLACE, INC., AHV DESERT VILLAS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ARROWHEAD PLACE, LTD., CACTUS ROSE, LTD., DESERT BREEZE, LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pirela v. Miranda
as 16-4021
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joseph Pirela
Defendant - Appellee:
Angel Miranda, Denis Fonseca, Thomas Williams and others
Pirela v. Miranda et al
as 1:2016cv24631
Plaintiff:
Joseph Pirela
Defendant:
Angel Miranda, Denis Fonseca, Thomas Williams-David and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Joseph Pirela v. Angel Miranda, et al
as 16-16920
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH PIRELA
Defendant - Appellee:
ANGEL MIRANDA, DENIS FONSECA, THOMAS WILLIAMS and others
Pirela v. Miranda et al
as 1:2016cv08135
Plaintiff:
Joseph Pirela
Defendant:
Angel Miranda, Denis Fonseca, Thomas Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pirela v. Miranda et al
as 1:2016cv24301
Plaintiff:
Joseph Pirela
Defendant:
Angel Miranda, Denis Fonseca, Thomas Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pirela v. Miranda et al
as 1:2016cv23707
Plaintiff:
Joseph Pirela
Defendant:
Angel Miranda, Denis Fonseca, David Countin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Joseph Pirela v. Ethiel Calderon, et al
as 16-15225
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH PIRELA
Defendant - Appellee:
ETHIEL CALDERON, ANGEL JOSE MIRANDA, LYDIA NICOLE ROBERTS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
