Cases 61 - 70 of 77
Roschen et al v. Wabasha County et al
as 0:2013cv02490
Plaintiff:
Debra Roschen , James Roschen , Megan Roschen and others
Defendant:
Wabasha County , Anoka County , Anoka County Community Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bass v. Anoka County et al
as 0:2013cv00860
Plaintiff:
Brooke Nicole Bass
Defendant:
Anoka County, Benton County , Blue Earth County and others
Whigham et al v. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources et al
as 0:2013cv00208
Plaintiff:
Thomas Whigham , Richard Whigham , Debbra Flicker and others
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources , Minnesota Department of Public Safety, Tom Landwehr and others
Dillard v. Minnesota Department of Correction et al
as 0:2012cv02636
Plaintiff:
Freddie L. Dillard
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Correction, Joan Fabian, Tom Roy and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv00533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Tom Roy, et al.
as 0:2011cv03740
Plaintiff:
Tony Dejuan Jackson
Defendant:
Minnesota, State of, Lori Swanson, Lori Skjerven Gildea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Tom Roy, et al.
as 0:2011cv03739
Plaintiff:
Tony Dejuan Jackson
Defendant:
Minnesota, State of, Lori Swanson, Matthew E. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Tom Roy, et al.
as 0:2011cv03738
Plaintiff:
Tony Dejuan Jackson
Defendant:
Minnesota, State of, Lori Swanson, Lori Skjerven Gildea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Jackson, County of et al
as 0:2011cv02660
Plaintiff:
Craig L. Anderson
Defendant:
Jackson, County of , Margaret Salzwedal, Terry Whitman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2011cv01297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
