Cases 61 - 70 of 159
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01427
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01428
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Kurtze v. Kohn et al
as 2:2017cv01057
Defendant:
Edward Kane, Philip J. Kohn, Lance Maningo and others
Plaintiff:
Giovanni K Kurtze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. Pastuna et al
as 2:2017cv00808
Plaintiff:
Arnold Anderson
Defendant:
J Auschwitz, K Bryant, Binu Palal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barrington v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2017cv00150
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Rene Barrington
Defendant:
Shanleigh A. Brethauer, Nathan R. Champa, Diana N. Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
State of Nevada v. Edwards
as 2:2017cv00645
Defendant:
K Barrie, City of Las Vegas, County of Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Ambrose Edwards
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00625
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Ramos-Rodriguez v. Beck et al
as 2:2017cv00498
Defendant:
Alyn Beck, Timothy Browder, Dr Duran and others
Plaintiff:
Manuel Ramos-Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00400
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Corzine v. Laxalt et al
as 3:2017cv00052
Defendant:
Patrick J. Conmay, Adam Paul Laxalt, K. Lomprey and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Corzine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
