Cases 61 - 70 of 93
Richardson et al v. Shubert et al
as 3:2014cv01027
Defendant:
Carlos Crutch, Kristin Lemon, Danielle Santili-Day and others
Plaintiff:
I.R., James Powell, Kelly J. Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Farthing v. Siel
as 3:2014cv00804
Plaintiff:
Kip A. Farthing
Defendant:
Erin Kelly Siel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hand v. Loosli et al
as 6:2013cv00315
Defendant:
Diane Bas, Daniel Bouck, Jim Burge and others
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Hand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00023
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Willes v. Linn County et al
as 6:2011cv06409
Defendant:
Deputy Brad Kelly, Linn County, Sheriff Tim Mueller and others
Plaintiff:
Clark Willes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Fabre v. O'Brien et al
as 3:2011cv01379
Defendant:
Olga Bendinger, M.D., Kelly Jones, Jason McLaughlin and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip Marc Fabre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Kelly v. Brown et al
as 3:2011cv00975
Defendant:
John V. Acosta, Sam Adams, Ann L. Aiken and others
503) 296-5762 (fax:
Roberta Kelly
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Kelly v. Eckert et al
as 3:2011cv00949
Defendant:
John V. Acosta, Sam Adams, Ann L. Aiken and others
503) 296-5762 (fax:
Roberta Kelly
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Broyles v. Oregon State Board of Higher Education et al
as 3:2011cv00144
Defendant:
Scott Barnett, Eileen Brennan, Lynda M. Ciuffetti and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip A. Broyles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
