Cases 61 - 70 of 75
Will Porter v. Christopher Epps, Commissioner
as 09-60324
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WILL TERRANCE PORTER
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER B EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Dorothy Washington v. Mississippi Department of Corr
as 09-60297
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOROTHY ANN WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Fleming v. Tunica County et al
as 2:2009cv00011
Plaintiff:
Hosey Fleming
Defendant:
Tunica County, K. C. Hamp, Charlie Wright and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dandridge v. State of Mississippi et al
as 2:2008cv00229
Plaintiff:
Mary Dandridge
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Mississippi Department of Corrections, John & Jane Does 1-50 and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00624
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
The Estate of Suzzanne Rhodes et al v. Mississippi Department of Corrections
as 3:2008cv00527
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Suzzanne Rhodes and Nycole Stephens
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Walker, et al v. Epps, et al
as 08-60652
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALAN DALE WALKER, PAUL EVERETTE WOODWARD and GERALD JAMES HOLLAND
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and LAWRENCE KELLY, Superintendent of the Mississippi State Penitentiary at Parchman
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00399
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dobbs v. Byrd, et al
as 08-60535
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS DOBBS
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND BYRD, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Hillie v. Mississippi Department of Corrections
as 4:2008cv00070
Plaintiff:
George Hillie
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
