Cases 61 - 70 of 81
Martin Richard Pemstein et al v. State of California et al
as 8:2011cv00016
Defendant:
Central District Appeals Court of CA, Jaime C Holmes, Peter Polos and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Richard Pemstein
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00649
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chris Kohler v. Presidio International, Inc.
as 2:2010cv04680
Defendant:
QS Retail, Inc., PHV Retail Stores, Inc., The Donna Kara Company Store, LLC and others
Claimant:
Bed Bath and Beyond
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
John P Daniels
Plaintiff:
Chris Kohler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00944
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010at00714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Polo v. Xerox Corp.
as 6:2010cv06288
Plaintiff:
Francesca Polo
Defendant:
Xerox Corp.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00365
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
ROSENBLATT v. COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX NJ et al
as 3:2009cv04054
Plaintiff:
JARED ROSENBLATT
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX NJ, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS, MIDDLESEX COUNTY ADULT CORRECTION CENTER ("MCACC") and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ATKINSON v. COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2009cv03850
Plaintiff:
JORDAN ATKINSON
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX NEW JERSEY, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS, MIDDLESEX COUNTY ADULT CORRECTION CENTER ("MCACC") and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
