Cases 61 - 70 of 86
Redell v. City of Davenport et al
as 3:2014cv00088
Plaintiff:
Brandie Redell
Defendant:
City of Davenport, Scott Crowe and Vincent Jacobsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bloomer et al v. Caffrey et al
as 3:2014cv00078
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bloomer and Karla Harksen
Defendant:
Joe Caffrey, Henry W Latham, II , Scott County IA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv04031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv04064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Aguilera v. Wright County, Iowa et al
as 3:2013cv03034
Plaintiff:
Jose Angel Aguilera
Defendant:
Wright County, Iowa, Lee E Poppen, Jeffrey TeKippe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Campbell, et al v. Kelly, et al
as 3:2013cv00041
Plaintiff:
Edward A Campbell, Jr. and Theresa Green
Defendant:
Patrick Kelly, Kelly Cunningham, Richard Voy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv02007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Wing v. City of Davenport et al
as 3:2012cv00136
Plaintiff:
Jason Allen Wing
Defendant:
City of Davenport , Gilbert Proehl , Brian Schertz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Hammock v. Jensen et al
as 3:2012cv00094
Plaintiff:
Calvin Hammock
Defendant:
Brad Jensen, Samuel Miller, Epigmenio Canas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
