Cases 61 - 70 of 589
Ledet v. Vandamm Enterprises, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01186
Plaintiff:
George Ledet
Defendant:
Vandamm Enterprises, LLC, Thomas Chorey, Jr., Daniel White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01185
Plaintiff:
Keisha Jones
Defendant:
Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC, Randell Jackson, Sheriff Tim Pounds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
State of Georgia v. Reeves
as 2:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
State of Georgia
Defendant:
Yovaniqua Quantiz Reeves
HARDRICK v. GEORGIA et al
as 4:2023cv00046
Plaintiff:
EDRICK HARDRICK
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, MUSCOGEE COUNTY GEORGIA, MUSCOGEE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BURTCH v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 3:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
CURTIS DEAN BURTCH, JR
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, JOHNSON RESIDENTS and WIFI -800 510
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jutawin v. Floyd County Superior Court et al
as 1:2023cv00418
Plaintiff:
Nagipe Jutawin and Julia Catherine Stanley
Defendant:
Floyd County Superior Court and State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morgan: Ronya-Darrelle v. The United States et al.
as 1:2023cv00367
Respondent:
The United States and The State of Georgia
Claimant:
Morgan: Ronya-Darrelle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
State of Georgia v. Cook
as 3:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
State of Georgia
Defendant:
Dasmin Jerel Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Caudle v. Fulton County et al
as 1:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
Allen Okechukwu Caudle
Defendant:
Fulton County, State of Georgia, City of Sandy Springs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Glass v. The State of Georgia
as 1:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
Kardarius Kantrez Glass
Defendant:
The State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
