Cases 61 - 70 of 70
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rutledge v. Cuccinelli et al
as 2:2011cv00286
Plaintiff:
Merle T. Rutledge, Jr.
Defendant:
Ken Cuccinelli, Commonwealth of Virginia, Norfolk State University and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Correct Care Solutions, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv01012
Plaintiff:
Obah Farah Walker
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, LLC, Nigist Ketema, Jo-Ann Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00046
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA)
Murphy v. Goff et al
as 6:2010cv00026
Defendant:
Carolyn Baker, Deborah Berkley, Bridges Treatment Center and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Murphy and Robert Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Craft et al v. City of Richmond et al
as 3:2010cv00056
Plaintiff:
James Lee Craft, James Lee Craft, Matthew Ray and others
Defendant:
City of Richmond, Norman Sales, Rodney D. Monroe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Right Denial of Due Process
LeFande v. Moore et al
as 1:2010cv00001
Plaintiff:
Matthew August LeFande
Defendant:
Neadie L. Moore, Burton Thomas Walker and Lisa Digiorgio McGee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ware v. James City County, Virginia et al
as 4:2008cv00008
Plaintiff:
W. Walker Ware, IV
Defendant:
James City County, Virginia, Board of Supervisors, Officer E. James and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
