Cases 61 - 70 of 1,943
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
CANTRELL v. BRUNSWICK MAINE POLICE et al
as 2:2023cv00283
Plaintiff:
BRICE CANTRELL
Defendant:
BRUNSWICK MAINE POLICE, TOWN OF BRUNSWICK, SCOTT STEWART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DURAND-MCDONNELL v. EDGECOMB et al
as 1:2023cv00279
Plaintiff:
ELI DURAND-MCDONNELL
Defendant:
KEVIN EDGECOMB and NATHAN FORMBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
NASS v. MAINE BOARD OF LICENSURE IN MEDICINE, et al
as 1:2023cv00321
Plaintiff:
MERYL J NASS, MD
Defendant:
MAINE BOARD OF LICENSURE IN MEDICINE, MAROULLA S GLEATON, MD, HOLLY FANJOY, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
ST DOMINIC ACADEMY et al v. MAKIN et al
as 2:2023cv00246
Plaintiff:
ST DOMINIC ACADEMY doing business as ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF PORTLAND, ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF PORTLAND, KEITH RADONIS and others
Defendant:
A PENDER MAKIN, JEFFERSON ASHBY, EDWARD DAVID and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FEELEY v. GOSS
as 2:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
STEVEN L FEELEY
Defendant:
JEFFERY GOSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
