Cases 71 - 80 of 81
Bowman et al v. Rendlen et al
as 4:2010cv01330
Plaintiff:
Ethel M. Bowman and Dwayne E. Anderson
Defendant:
Charles E. Rendlen, III, Dana C. McWay, Susan Paszkiewicz-Toler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv04035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American with Disabilities Act
Hirakawa et al v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 6:2009cv03488
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Hirakawa, Estate of Lucky Hirakawa, Kaui Hirakawa and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Marty C. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv03018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jackson v. Schaffer et al
as 2:2008cv04035
Plaintiff:
Floyd Jackson
Defendant:
Keith Schaffer, Marty Martin, Felix Vincenz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grooms v. Arras et al
as 2:2008cv04034
Plaintiff:
Kevin Scott Grooms
Defendant:
Thomas Arras, Janet Kettle, Nikki Hinz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Anderson v. Larkins et al
as 4:2008cv00155
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Anderson
Defendant:
Steve Larkins, Pat Smith, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00653
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
