Cases 71 - 80 of 108
Assenberg et al v. County of Whitman et al
as 2:2014cv00145
Plaintiff:
Michael Adam Assenberg , Carla Assenberg and David J Armstrong
Defendant:
County of Whitman , Whitman County Sheriffs Department , Brett Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunakin v. Quigley et al
as 2:2014cv00567
Plaintiff:
Adam Dunakin
Defendant:
Kevin W Quigley and Dorothy F Teeter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClain v. 1st Security Bank of Washington et al
as 2:2013cv02277
Plaintiff:
Charles V McClain, III
Defendant:
1st Security Bank of Washington , May-Ling Sowell , John Doe Sowell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv05260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Adams et al v. Bauer et al
as 2:2013cv00338
Plaintiff:
Matthew Adams , Glenn Crespo , Connor Day and others
Defendant:
David Bauer , Jacob Briskey , Lindsay Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv06030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Theiss v. County of Snohomish, et al
as 2:2012cv01880
Plaintiff:
James T. Theiss
Defendant:
County of Snohomish , Adam Fortney and Jane Doe Fortney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Gebreselassie v. Schoenberg et al
as 2:2012cv01580
Plaintiff:
Amanuel Gebreselassie
Defendant:
Brett Schoenberg , Casey Steiger , Brian Blase and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mackey v. Adams et al
as 2:2012cv01437
Plaintiff:
Donald K Mackey
Defendant:
John Q Adams, Jane Doe Adams, Brandon Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDonald v. Warner et al
as 2:2012cv05089
Plaintiff:
Scott W McDonald
Defendant:
Bernard Warner, Jane Doe Warner, Eldon Vail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
