Cases 71 - 80 of 87
COOK v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2009cv04696
Plaintiff:
TYRONE COOK
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CHARLES RAMSEY, JOHN J. GAITIENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cook v. Wayne County et al
as 3:2009cv01214
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Cook and Cheryl Cook
Defendant:
Wayne County and Genevieve H. Morelli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COOK v. THE ROMAN ARCHDIOCESE OF GREENSBURG et al
as 2:2009cv00829
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH COOK
Defendant:
THE ROMAN ARCHDIOCESE OF GREENSBURG and GREENSBURG CENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wager v. York County Domestic Relations et al
as 1:2009cv01073
Plaintiff:
Neil J. Wager
Defendant:
York County Domestic Relations, Jill Connor, Andrea Marceca Strong, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cook v. Floyd et al
as 1:2009cv00106
Plaintiff:
Jimmie L. Cook
Defendant:
Homer C. Floyd, Lyle M. Wood, Raymond Cartwright and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
COOK v. INDOVINA et al
as 2:2008cv00054
Plaintiff:
JIMMIE L. COOK
Defendant:
PHIL INDOVINA, PHIL'S FLICKS & ASSOCIATES and LINDA COOK
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
AMOROSO v. OSBORNE et al
as 2:2008cv05189
Plaintiff:
ROBERT AMOROSO
Defendant:
OSBORNE, JAMES, ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00942
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00871
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act 1993 (FMLA)
Roach et al v. Marrow et al
as 3:2008cv01136
Plaintiff:
Donald L. Roach, Deneen Roach, Matthew Roach and others
Defendant:
Kenneth Marrow, John Adams, Jr., Cathy A. Cook and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
