Cases 71 - 80 of 153
Pauletta Jr. v. Judge Evans et al
as 1:2017cv01625
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Pauletta Jr.
Defendant:
Judge Evans, DA Marsco, Ryan P. Shovlin and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Altavilla v. Larksville Borough Police et al
as 3:2017cv01588
Plaintiff:
Robert John Altavilla
Defendant:
Larksville Borough Police , Shawn Reilly , Nicholas Riebel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
EVANS v. MCCUTCHEON et al
as 2:2017cv03016
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. EVANS
Defendant:
EDNA MCCUTCHEON, ALISSA WILLIAMS, LEAH MANRUSCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RETTEW v. LANCASTER COUNTY et al
as 5:2017cv02957
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN L. RETTEW
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY , PAUL K. SMEAL , EVAN MARIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BIESECKER v. CEREBRAL PALSY ASSOCIATION, CHESTER COUNTY DISABILITIES SERVICES et al
as 5:2017cv02586
Plaintiff:
EVAN BIESECKER
Defendant:
CEREBRAL PALSY ASSOCIATION, CHESTER COUNTY DISABILITIES SERVICES, MARGARET RYBINSKY, LINDA REDDING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01529
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
EVANS et al v. MOYEMONT
as 2:2017cv00202
Plaintiff:
TWILA EVANS and MISTY RUSSMAN
Defendant:
STEVEN MOYEMONT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EVANS v. MUNICIPALITY OF MONROEVILLE et al
as 2:2017cv00187
Plaintiff:
HEATH EVANS
Defendant:
MUNICIPALITY OF MONROEVILLE, BOROUGH OF PITCAIRN, MONROEVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tiebout v. Shaw et al
as 1:2016cv02247
Plaintiff:
John Tiebout
Defendant:
Robert Shaw, Kelly Evans and John Misquitta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TARR v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2016cv01424
Plaintiff:
LEO Z. TARR
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH , ANTONIO RUIZ , TIMOTHY CRANE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
