Cases 71 - 80 of 108
Young v. Brantley et al
as 3:2012cv00616
Plaintiff:
Cecil Young
Defendant:
Mary Brantley, Angel DePara, Jr., Thomas McCarthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00549
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Feliciano v. Bridgeport, et al
as 3:2011cv01875
Plaintiff:
William Feliciano
Defendant:
City of Bridgeport , Ronald Mercado , Joseph Lawlor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez et al v. Mullen et al
as 3:2011cv01787
Plaintiff:
Lisa Martinez and Sensational Smiles, LLC
Defendant:
Jewel Mullen , Jeanne P. Strathearn , Lance E. Banwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mexico Construction et al v. Thompson
as 3:2011cv01590
Plaintiff:
Mexico Construction and Martin Mendoza
Defendant:
Mel Thompson
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Jimenez-Jarmillo et al v. Feliciano et al
as 3:2011cv01583
Plaintiff:
Luis Jimenez-Jarmillo , M. J. and F. J.
Defendant:
Martin Feliciano, James Lewis and City of New Haven
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Handsome, Inc. et al v. Monroe et al
as 3:2011cv01288
Plaintiff:
Handsome, Inc. , Todd Cascella and Mona Cascella
Defendant:
Town of Monroe , Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Monroe , Scott H. Schatzlein and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Colebut v. Levin et al
as 3:2011cv01274
Plaintiff:
Noerck Colebut
Defendant:
Barry Levin, M.M.B Management Co. L.L.C., Gilman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nowacki v. Malloy et al
as 3:2011cv01242
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Nowacki
Defendant:
Dannel Malloy, Andrew McDonald, Michael Lawlor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00947
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
