Cases 71 - 80 of 177
Patterson v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice et al
as 4:2015cv02922
Plaintiff:
Nelson Patterson
Defendant:
Texas Department Of Criminal Justice, Christopher Carter, Chad Wakefield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinchback et al v. Gomez et al
as 6:2015cv00805
Plaintiff:
Sandra Pinchback , Monica S. Walker , Rachel Crawford-Anderson and others
Defendant:
Leon Gomez , Unknown Clary , Unknown Kimbrough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv02248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00233
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rich v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice
as 4:2015cv01439
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Austin Rich
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Polk County v. Ratcliff et al
as 1:2015cv00245
Cross Defendant:
Gregg Abbott, Bradshaw State Jail, City of Livingston and others
Defendant:
Hull & Associates, P.C., LHR, Inc., OneWest Bank, FSB and others
Plaintiff:
Polk County
Counter Defendant:
Polk County, Texas
Cross Claimant:
Elijah W. Ratcliff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1) Rent, Lease & Ejectment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00664
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Rich v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice
as 9:2014cv00176
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Austin Rich
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
