Cases 71 - 80 of 102
Bah et al v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2013cv02789
Plaintiff:
Natu Bah , Diariou Diallo , Aminata Kaba and others
Defendant:
State Of Tennessee, Attorney General of the State of Tennessee and Tennessee State Board of Cosmetology
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
McWilliams v. Johnson City Police Department et al
as 2:2013cv00105
Plaintiff:
Aaron McWilliams
Defendant:
Johnson City Police Department, City of Johnson City, TN and East Tennessee State University
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
The Court of General Sessions Shelby County, Tennessee State of Tennessee v. Yahweh
as 2:2012cv02895
Plaintiff:
The Court of General Sessions Shelby County, Tennessee State of Tennessee
Defendant:
Yahoshua- Yisrael: Yahweh
Miscellaneou:
Edward L. Stanton, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00393
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Clark v. McThee et al
as 3:2012cv00948
Plaintiff:
Randall Clark
Defendant:
Sidney McThee and Middle Tennessee State University
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00628
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0701
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
