Cases 71 - 80 of 644
WOODS v. IMPD
as 1:2022cv01665
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM PLYANDER WOODS
Defendant:
IMPD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILLIAMS v. TURNER et al
as 1:2022cv01407
Plaintiff:
TIFFANIE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
JAY TURNER, JOHNNY ANGEL, ANDREW STORIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Millwood v. Labno et al
as 2:2022cv00212
Defendant:
Debbie Millwood, Christopher Labno, Bureau of Alcohol, tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILLIAMS et al v. DELAWARE COUNTY INDIANA et al
as 1:2022cv01480
Plaintiff:
TIFFANIE WILLIAMS and LANZELL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
DELAWARE COUNTY INDIANA, DELAWARE COUNTY SHERRIFFS OFFICE, TOWN OF EATON INDIANA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davidson v. Vanderpool et al
as 1:2022cv00244
Plaintiff:
Randall K Davidson, II
Defendant:
Benjamin Vanderpool, Robert Macallen, III, Christopher Goff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
KELLY v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv01256
Plaintiff:
RICHARD KELLY
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, KAY WILKS, M.D., CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DURHAM v. ROSSER et al
as 1:2022cv01110
Plaintiff:
DEREK DURHAM
Defendant:
BRADLEY ROSSER, ROBBIE FEE, WILLIAM AMMERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
