Cases 71 - 80 of 89
DENBOW v. TOWN OF WINDHAM et al
as 2:2011cv00361
Plaintiff:
RAY MICHAEL DENBOW
Defendant:
TOWN OF WINDHAM, ANTHONY PLANTE, RICHARD LEWSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
ESTATE OF CRAIG L ALLARD, et al v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2011cv00283
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF CRAIG L ALLARD and CHARLENE ALLARD
Defendant:
ROBERT A WILLIAMS , PHILLIP ALEXANDER , ROGER TEACHOUT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DESENA et al v. STATE OF MAINE et al
as 1:2011cv00117
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DESENA and SANDRA W DUNHAM
Defendant:
STATE OF MAINE , PAUL LEPAGE , KEVIN RAYE and others
Intervenor_defendant:
MAINE DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CADY et al v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL et al
as 2:2010cv00512
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES INC, ALFONSO CORONA and others
Plaintiff:
KATHERINE M CADY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NICKERSON-MALPHER v. ATTORNEY GENERAL, MAINE et al
as 1:2010cv00329
Plaintiff:
MARGARET KATHLEEN NICKERSON-MALPHER
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, MAINE, STEVEN G ROWE, MAINE GOVERNOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
JONES v. LEWISTON, CITY OF et al
as 2:2010cv00102
Plaintiff:
KEVIN A JONES
Defendant:
LEWISTON, CITY OF, LEWISTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, WILLIAM WELSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
