Cases 81 - 90 of 106
Andrews et al v. Thole et al
as 0:2012cv02877
Plaintiff:
Kari L. Andrews , Brandon C. Bennett and Jeremy D. Boeckel
Defendant:
Brian R. Thole , Aaron L. Biard , Tyrone D. Barze, Jr. and others
Scullark v. Garin et al
as 0:2012cv01505
Plaintiff:
Olivia Scullark
Defendant:
Denise Garin , Linda S. Andrews , John Doe 1 - 5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brenner v. Lanasa et al
as 0:2012cv00742
Plaintiff:
Andrew Josef Brenner
Defendant:
Mark Lanasa , John Doe and Minneapolis, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jorgenson v. Reinbold et al
as 0:2012cv00387
Plaintiff:
William Lloyd Jorgenson
Defendant:
William Reinbold and Andrew Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newman v. Jansen et al
as 0:2012cv00184
Plaintiff:
Andrew Robert Newman
Defendant:
Margret Jansen, Jay M. Quam, Community Addiction Recovery Enterprise and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ellis et al v. Minneapolis, City of et al
as 0:2012cv00057
Plaintiff:
Andrew Ellis and Harriet Ellis
Defendant:
Minneapolis, City of and John and Jane Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Alexander v. Hedback, et al.
as 0:2011cv03590
Plaintiff:
Andrew Will Alexander
Defendant:
Mary Jo A Jensen-Carter , Saint Paul, City of , Sharon Lubinski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vilenchik et al v. Crystal, City of et al
as 0:2011cv02711
Plaintiff:
Andrew Vilenchik , Community Finance Group, Inc. , Priority Title, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Crystal, City of , John Banick , David Oyaas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2011cv02464
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hedican v. St. Paul Police Department et al
as 0:2011cv02240
Plaintiff:
Patrick Hedican, IV
Defendant:
St. Paul Police Department and Andrew Heroux
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
