Cases 81 - 90 of 116
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Daly v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 3:2014cv00250
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth K. Daly
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia , Andrew T. Covey , Armon Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Perry-Bey et al v. Holder et al
as 1:2014cv00215
Plaintiff:
Roy L. Perry-Bey and Ronald M. Green
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Angela J. Miller, T. Christian Herren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Wrongful Termination of Employment
Hall v. Arlington County, Virginia et al
as 1:2013cv00656
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Hall
Defendant:
Arlington County, Virginia, Arlington County Police Department, Andrew Morgan Ivie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Andrews v. Paxson
as 3:2012cv00879
Plaintiff:
Donald W. Andrews, Jr.
Defendant:
Deborah M. Paxson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fialdini v. Cote et al
as 1:2012cv01056
Plaintiff:
Andrew Fialdini
Defendant:
Eric Cote, Jaime Sanford, Gary Gaither and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Chennault v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2012cv00514
Plaintiff:
Christina Chennault
Defendant:
Michelle B. Mitchell , Gary L. Sink and Andrew A. Barnhouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Arlington County, Virginia et al
as 1:2012cv00666
Plaintiff:
Jonathan LLoyd Hall
Defendant:
Arlington County, Virginia, Arlington County Police Department , Andrew Morgan Ivie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
