Civil Rights Cases filed in Alabama
Cases 81 - 90 of 110
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2012cv02315
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
McCall v. Bentley et al (MAG+) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00696
Plaintiff: Harry L. McCall
Defendant: Robert Bentley , John Andrews and Lashun Hutson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011mc01661
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv03306
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv01924
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv01619
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00354
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Hirsch v. Mathews et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2010cv00134
Plaintiff: Arthur Hirsch
Defendant: William Mathews , Sandra Tucker , Ricky Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv02431
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Edison v. Birmingham, City of, Alabama et al
as 2:2009cv02106
Plaintiff: Andrew G Edison, Jr
Defendant: Birmingham, City of, Alabama, A.C. Roper and James Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Type: Civil Rights None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?