Cases 81 - 90 of 306
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02557
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
SMITH v. MITCHELL et al
as 2:2016cv06610
Plaintiff:
DANIEL SMITH
Defendant:
EDWARD MITCHELL, NELSON OCASIO and JOHN DOE 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROOKS v. DOOLEY et al
as 2:2016cv06136
Plaintiff:
DARRYL BROOKS
Defendant:
PATRICK J. DOOLEY, PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv05731
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
JOHNSON v. ABRAHAMSEN RATCHFORD, P.C. et al
as 2:2016cv05309
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA P. JOHNSON
Defendant:
ABRAHAMSEN RATCHFORD, P.C., X,Y,Z CORPORATIONS and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
HOLMES v. GORDON AND WEINBERG, P.C. et al
as 2:2016cv05308
Plaintiff:
ELLWOOD HOLMES
Defendant:
GORDON AND WEINBERG, P.C. and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
PARK v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY et al
as 2:2016cv05025
Plaintiff:
SEAN PARK
Defendant:
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY , AMID ISMAIL , LEONA SPERAZZA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CURRY v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv04482
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CURRY
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., UNITED PARCEL SERVICE OF PA, INC., INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AYERS v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv04339
Plaintiff:
KEVIN AYERS
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , THE PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, SEAN QUINN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEWDNEY v. TABAS AND ROSEN, P.C. et al
as 2:2016cv02865
Plaintiff:
W. DEWDNEY
Defendant:
TABAS AND ROSEN, P.C., X,Y,Z CORPORATIONS and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
