Cases 81 - 90 of 1,409
Doe v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Doe #031 v. Lee
as 4:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
John Doe #031
Defendant:
William - Lee, William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Doe #028 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
John Doe #028
Defendant:
William - Lee, David B. Rausch, William Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Doe #24 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
John Doe #24
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. United States Probation Office of the Eastern District of Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
United States Probation Office of the Eastern District of Tennessee, Lawson Burrow, Amber Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #021 v. Lee, et al.
as 3:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
John Doe #021
Defendant:
Governor William B Lee, Director David B. Rausch, William B Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00123
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Doe #026 v. William Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
John Doe #026
Defendant:
William Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Doe #030 v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
John Doe #030
Defendant:
William - Lee, David B. Rausch and William Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
