Cases 81 - 90 of 232
BONAPARTE et al v. BENSALEM TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2017cv03209
Plaintiff:
RODNEY BONAPARTE and APRIL KILSON
Defendant:
BENSALEM TOWNSHIP , POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE #1, POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
STEWART v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA-DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 2:2017cv00770
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA STEWART
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA-DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES , TED DALLAS , ROBERT SNYDER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
JOHNSON v. DEL RICCI et al
as 2:2017cv02542
Plaintiff:
AMIRI JOHNSON
Defendant:
RYAN DEL RICCI, MICHAEL SIDEBOTHAM, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSARIO v. BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2017cv02169
Plaintiff:
FRANK RODRIGUEZ ROSARIO
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LORD v. COLEMAN et al
as 1:2017cv00019
Plaintiff:
LYNDA LORD
Defendant:
TREVON W. COLEMAN, NANCY GIROUX, MICHAEL CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOE v. REBER et al
as 2:2017cv00081
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
JOSHUA T. REBER, ANTHONY J. BERGER , CHARLES L. CLAYPOOL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOE 1 v. REBER et al
as 2:2017cv00080
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE 1
Defendant:
JOSHUA T. REBER, ANTHONY J. BERGER , CHARLES L. CLAYPOOL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALKER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv00115
Plaintiff:
FRANK OWENS WALKER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , DAT NGUYEN , HBARR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CENTUOLO v. SPICER et al
as 2:2016cv05430
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS CENTUOLO
Defendant:
MICHAEL SPICER , OFFICER JOHN DOE 1, OFFICER JOHN DOE 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WHITE v. KING et al
as 2:2016cv01001
Plaintiff:
CARLOS WHITE
Defendant:
ADRIAN KING, DAVID TYLER, DANIELLE OSMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
