Cases 81 - 90 of 103
Ceasar v. Sams Town of Shreveport et al
as 5:2017cv01460
Plaintiff:
Ronnie R Ceasar
Defendant:
Sams Town of Shreveport, Boyd Gaming, T Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronnie Ceasar v. Equiafax Credit Reporting, et al
as 17-30854
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONNIE R. CEASAR
Defendant - Appellee:
EQUIAFAX CREDIT REPORTING, WOODFOREST NATIONAL BANK HOUSTON, WOODFOREST NATIONAL BANK ALEXANDRIA and others
Ceasar v. Veterans Administration et al
as 2:2017cv10548
Plaintiff:
R. Ceasar
Defendant:
Veterans Administration and United States Department of Treasury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ceasar v. Equiafax Credit Reporting et al
as 1:2017cv01167
Plaintiff:
Ronnie R Ceasar
Defendant:
Equiafax Credit Reporting, Woodforest National Bank Houston, Woodforest National Bank Alexandria and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Ceasar v. Louisiana Board of Ethics (BOE) et al
as 3:2017cv00562
Defendant:
Kathleen Allen, Stephen Babcock, R Michael Caldwell and others
Plaintiff:
R. Ceasar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ronnie Ceasar v. Tood Neesom, et al
as 17-30422
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONNIE R. CEASAR
Defendant - Appellee:
TOOD NEESOM, DAVID HEBERT and DAVID DESHOTEL
Ceasar v. Neesom et al
as 1:2017cv00578
Plaintiff:
Ronnie R Ceasar
Defendant:
Tood Neesom, David Hebert and David Deshotel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Doe v. Louisiana Board of Ethics, et al
as 17-30204
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN DOE, also known as R. Ceasar
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUISIANA BOARD OF ETHICS (BOE), KATHLEEN M. ALLEN, Administrator for State of Louisiana, DOUG WELBORN, Clerk of Court 19th Judicial District Court and others
R. Ceasar v. USA
as 13-30457
Plaintiff - Appellant:
R. CEASAR
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
R. Ceasar v. USA, et al
as 12-30460
Plaintiff - Appellant:
R. CEASAR
Defendant - Appellee:
CORNELL JOHNSON, FRED STEVENS, KEVIN RICKS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
