Cases 81 - 90 of 135
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Williams v. Walker et al
as 2:2013cv00400
Plaintiff:
Antonio Shawn Williams
Defendant:
Ebony Marie Walker and Barron S Coe, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
White v. City of Birmingham, Alabama et al
as 2:2013cv00099
Plaintiff:
Justin A White
Defendant:
City of Birmingham, Alabama and William A Bell, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Weaver v. Town of Mount Vernon, AL
as 1:2012cv00750
Plaintiff:
Framon Weaver, Sr.
Defendant:
Town of Mount Vernon, AL , Jerry Lundy , Steve Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Newton, et al v. State of Alabama, et al(PANEL)(MEMBER)
as 2:2012cv01081
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Newton , Alabama Democratic Conference , Framon Weaver, Sr. and others
Defendant:
State of Alabama , Robert J. Bentley and Beth Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
Hunter-Benefield et al v. Serra Honda
as 2:2012cv03631
Plaintiff:
Nancy Hunter-Benefield and Lorenza Benefield, Sr
Defendant:
Serra Honda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Butler v. Morgan et al
as 5:2012cv03601
Plaintiff:
James Laurence Butler, Sr
Defendant:
Tim Morgan , Robert Broussard , Jane Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011mc03709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Townsend v. Nixon et al
as 2:2012cv01076
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Townsend
Defendant:
Leonard Nixon, Glenda Nixon, Glenda Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
