Cases 81 - 90 of 97
ALLEN v. ERIE METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2010cv00126
Plaintiff:
AUGUSTUS ALLEN , III
Defendant:
ERIE METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY, CITY OF ERIE, COUNTY OF ERIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres v. Nike Retail Services, Inc.
as 3:2010cv00650
Plaintiff:
Shanda Torres
Defendant:
Nike Retail Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
COOPER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2010cv00099
Plaintiff:
DENNIS COOPER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and JERRY TORRES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Torres v. Shinseki et al
as 1:2009cv02304
Plaintiff:
Pedro Torres
Defendant:
Eric K. Shinseki and John Callahan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Rivera et al v. Snavely et al
as 1:2009cv02243
Plaintiff:
Digna Rivera and Roberto Torres
Defendant:
Kevin Snavely, Bithia Rissinger, Keith Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TORRES v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2009cv04439
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH TORRES
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and KENNETH B. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ANDERSON et al v. COPE et al
as 5:2009cv04330
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROBERT ANDERSON and SHEILLA ANDERSON
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER J. COPE, TODD A. CESSNA, CODY S. CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01596
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
MARTINEZ et al v. LANCASTER COUNTY et al
as 5:2009cv00026
Plaintiff:
JUAN MARTINEZ and ELIZABETH MARTINEZ
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY, VINCENT GUARINI, STEVEN NAPOLITAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv05141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
