Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Johnson et al v. Jones et al
as 3:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Wendy Marie Johnson and James Arthur Johnson
Defendant:
Ethan Jones, Chase McKeown, Thomas Minter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr Notice of Removal
Jane Doe 1 et al v. Webster County, Kentucky et al
as 4:2021cv00093
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1-2, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2 and others
Defendant:
Webster County, Kentucky, Arthur Dale Collins, Jennifer Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaffer v. Daviess County, Kentucky et al
as 4:2019cv00133
Defendant:
Arthur Maglinger, Lorrin Mix, Ohio County Detention Center Medical Contractor and others
Plaintiff:
Brandi Shaffer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
Robinson v. Butler County, Kentucky et al
as 4:2018cv00172
Defendant:
Arthur Maglinger, Jane/John Doe, Rocky W. Tyree and others
Plaintiff:
Orlando Cortez Robinson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2016cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Washburn v. Love et al
as 2:2010cv00246
Plaintiff:
Arthur Washburn
Defendant:
Will Love, Carl Mullens and James Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
