Cases 1 - 10 of 85
Antonoplos v. Stewart et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00508
Defendant:
Troy University and Brandon Stewart
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Gadiel Antonoplos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
French, Sr. v. City Of Bay Minette et al
as 1:2024cv00265
Defendant:
Brandon Thompson and The City of Bay Minette
Plaintiff:
Otis French, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Moore v. Gadson et al
as 4:2024cv00925
Plaintiff:
Ephan Moore
Defendant:
Brandon Burns, Roderick Gadson, Jr. and Jajuan Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Ivey et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Nancy Buckner, Brandon Hardin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sylvester v. Rawlins
as 1:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Brandon Sylvester
Defendant:
Robert Rawlins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00611
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Thomas v. City of Dothan, Alabama et al
as 1:2023cv00214
Plaintiff:
Stavenious Thomas
Defendant:
City of Dothan, Alabama, Erik Broten, Brandon Cobb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jenkins v. Everette et al
as 1:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
Denzell Necoby Jenkins and Denzell Jenkins
Defendant:
Brandon Blaze Everette, City of Jackson, Al and Marlon Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Mejia v. Birmingham City of et al
as 2:2022cv01087
Plaintiff:
Clementina Ortiz Mejia
Defendant:
Birmingham City of, Brandon Jones and Luxe Ultra Lounge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
