Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Fitzgerald et al v. Northern Essex Community College
as 1:2023cv12660
Plaintiff:
Tracy Fitzgerald, Thomas Goulet, Dianne Lahaye and others
Defendant:
Northern Essex Community College
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
O'Shea et al v. Boston City Council
as 1:2022cv12048
Plaintiff:
Robert O'Shea, Rita Dixon, Shirley Shillingford and others
Defendant:
Boston City Council
Amicus Curiae:
NAACP Boston Branch, MassVote, Massachusetts Voter Table and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv11886
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Clervrain v. Healey et al
as 1:2022cv10545
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
Attorney General Maura Healey, Bill Galvin, Ed Markey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv40015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv10279
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thibeault v. Monks
as 1:2019cv12080
Plaintiff:
Shawn Thibeualt and Shawn Thibeault
Defendant:
Maureen Monks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lappen v. Cardoza et al
as 1:2019cv10609
Defendant:
George Dionne, Joseph Cardoza and Peter Flannery
Plaintiff:
Maureen Lappen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Francisco of the family Santos v. Essex County et al
as 1:2019cv10387
Defendant:
Christopher Harding, Maureen Ford, Michele Cristello and others
Plaintiff:
Francisco of the family Santos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
