Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Bey v. Jars Cannabis Dispensary et al
as 2:2024cv02327
Plaintiff:
Miyana Sa'kira Nubian Bey
Defendant:
Matthew Dubonsky, Jars Cannabis Dispensary and Sarah Stalker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bey v. Jars Cannabis Dispensary et al
as 2:2024cv01353
Defendant:
Matthew Dubkinsky, Sarah Stalker and Jars Cannabis Dispensary
Plaintiff:
Miyana Sa'kira Nubian Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carrillo v. Fox et al
as 2:2024cv01367
Defendant:
Rebecca Carrillo, Jaqueline Carrillo, Ramon Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Judy Carrillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00503
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Nakanwagi v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2023cv02441
Plaintiff:
Sarah Nathreen Nakanwagi
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of, Arizona, State of, Maricopa, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nakanwagi v. Arizona, State of
as 3:2023cv08610
Plaintiff:
Sarah Nathreen Nakanwagi
Defendant:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv08543
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Olding v. Layman et al
as 2:2023cv00725
Plaintiff:
Candace Lynne Sutherland Olding and Candace Sutherland
Defendant:
Sarah Layman, Vanessa Muro, Chris Borreho and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
